Email Alert   |   RSS

Journal of Integrative Nursing ›› 2020, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4): 196-202.doi: 10.4103/jin.jin_44_20

Previous Articles     Next Articles

An innovative approach of using online problem‑based learning and case‑based learning in teaching disaster nursing during the COVID‑19 pandemic

Yin-Ji LIANG1,#, Wei-Ju CHEN1,#, Shuang ZHOU1, Lin WANG2, Qiu-Ying LIAO3, Wan-Xian LU4, Chen-Li LIN5   

  1. 1 Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; 2 Department of Transitional Care; 3 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery; 4 Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; 5 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2020-07-08 Revised:2020-08-28 Accepted:2020-09-14 Online:2020-12-30 Published:2020-12-30
  • Contact: Dr. Chen‑Li LIN, School of Medicine, Jinan University, No. 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, China. E-mail: 253503166@qq.com
  • About author:#These authors are contributed equally to this article
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported in part by the 22nd Batch of Teaching Reform Research Projects of Jinan University (JG2020080), Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project of Undergraduate University of Guangdong in China (2017, 2020), Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship of Jinan University in China (no. CX20157, CX20145), Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau of Guangdong in China (no. 20161065 and 20201075), and National Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangdong in China (no. A2016583, A2017228, A2017140 and A2020137).

Abstract:

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the learning experience effect of online problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) in teaching disaster nursing.

Methods: According to the characteristics of online PBL and CBL, the revised curriculum experience questionnaire (CEQ) was used to evaluate the teaching quality. Cronbach’s coefficient and the reliability of the splithalf reliability questionnaire were calculated. The exploratory factor analysis of 26 items was carried out by principal component analysis and maximum variance rotation method. KaiserMeyerOlkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s tests were used to test the validity of the questionnaire. The comparison between groups was performed by oneway analysis of variance.

Results: A total of 191 questionnaires were issued and 183 copies were recovered, with a recovery rate of 95.8%. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of CEQ is 0.929, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of each dimension is between 0.713 and 0.924. After factor analysis, the KMO value was 0.817. The 26 items finally returned to 6 principal components, and all factor load values were above 0.7, indicating good factor analysis effect. This study found that students who learned disaster nursing had an ideal online learning experience, and the average value of CEQ was 3.74 ± 0.42. In particular, male students, senior students or medical students had a higher curriculum experience score. In addition, compared with the national recruitment, the international students have higher curriculum experience score on the dimension of Appropriate Assessment Scale, indicating that the international students are more inclined to use online PBL and CBL.

Conclusions: Using the revised CEQ is an innovative approach to evaluate the effect of online PBL and CBL in teaching disaster nursing, which can improve students’ experience and curriculum quality.