Email Alert   |   RSS

Journal of Integrative Nursing ›› 2024, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1): 41-48.doi: 10.4103/jin.jin_112_23

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Transcultural adaptation of Odia version of health-related kidney disease and quality of life-36 instrument

Rashmimala PRADHAN1, Pravati TRIPATHY2, Debaprasad KAR3   

  1. 1Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, SUM Nursing College, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; 2SUM Nursing College, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; 3Department of Nephrology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • Online:2024-03-27 Published:2024-03-29
  • Contact: Rashmimala PRADHAN, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, SUM Nursing College, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar ‑ 751 003, Odisha, India. E-mail: rashmimalapradhan@soa.ac.in

Abstract:

Objective: The study objective was to translate, validate, and test the reliability of the original kidney disease and quality of life-36 (KDQOL-36TM) instruments in Odia.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional design with a purposive sampling technique was used. According to RAND Corporation guidelines, initially, the items of the KDQOL-36TM questionnaires were translated into Odia by two independent, bilingual, professional translators, and then back?translated to English, followed by tryout and field testing. The experts validated the KDQOL-36TM instrument review committee for review related to kidney health conditions. The tool was implemented among 180 patients undergoing “maintenance” hemodialysis. The following tests evaluated reliability and validity: test–retest reliability with Cronbach’s alpha correlation (stability), (reliability) internal consistency, and contents validity index.
Results: The Cronbach’s alpha value and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) score of all five domains, namely “physical component summary, mental component summary (MCS), the burden of kidney disease, symptoms and problems of kidney disease, and effects of kidney disease” of both KDQOL-36TM English and Odia (KDQOL-36-ETM and KDQOL-36-OTM) version, recommended excellent homogeneity. A high positive correlation (r = 0.998) was found between the Odia version of KDQOL-36TM and the English version KDQOL-36TM questionnaire. The ICC score ranges from 0.889 to 0.997 at a 95% confidence interval for test–retest reliability, and Cronbach’s alpha was 0.832.
Conclusion: This study explores the Odia version of KDQOL-36TM psychometric properties, depicted at an acceptable level of internal consistency. The KDQOL-36-OTM instrument is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the kidney disease-related quality of life in Odia-speaking hemodialysis patients.